From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Henriquez v. William James Bushell Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2024
23-cv-2990 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-2990 (LJL)

03-08-2024

KEVIN DE HENRIQUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM JAMES BUSHELL CORP. D/B/A RADIANT SOLAR, Defendant.


ORDER

LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge

On March 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant to respond to document requests and interrogatories, Dkt. No. 39, and a motion for a sixty-day extension of the deadline to amend the pleadings, Dkt. No. 40. The Court took both motions under advisement and notified Defendant that the Court would consider them unopposed if Defendant did not respond by March 7, 2024. Dkt. Nos. 42-43.

As Defendant has not responded to either motion, the Court GRANTS them as unopposed. See Gesualdi v. Interstate Payroll Co., Inc., 2016 WL 737909, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2016); Alston v. Cahill, 2008 WL 5120735, at *2 (D. Conn. Dec. 5, 2008). Defendant shall produce the information and documents identified in Plaintiff's motion to compel by March 18, 2024.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close Dkt. Nos. 39 and 40.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

De Henriquez v. William James Bushell Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 8, 2024
23-cv-2990 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2024)
Case details for

De Henriquez v. William James Bushell Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN DE HENRIQUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 8, 2024

Citations

23-cv-2990 (LJL) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2024)