Opinion
22 Civ. 34 (AT) (GWG)
07-25-2022
De Fa Chen, Plaintiff, v. Nara Sushi 76 Inc. d/b/a Nara Sushi d/b/a Nara Sushi 76 d/b/a Kumo Sushi, Guimin Lin, Kathy Zeng, and Bo Huang, Andante
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The parties are reminded that they may consent to proceed before the Honorable Gabriel W. Gorenstein, who would then oversee the approval of the settlement. If the parties consent to Judge Gorenstein's jurisdiction, by August 1, 2022, they shall file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nysd.uscoiuls.gov/node/754 on the docket. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences.
If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Judge Gorenstein rather than before the undersigned. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Com! of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered.
SO ORDERED.
NOTICE, CONSENT, AND REFERENCE OF A CHIL ACTION TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Notice of a magistrate judge's availability. A United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to order the entry of a final judgment The judgment may then be appealed, directly to the United. States court of appeals Lie any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent.
You may consent to have your care referred to a magistrate judge. or you may withhold your content without adverse substantive consequences. The name of any party withholding consent will not be revealed to any judge who may otherwise be involved with your case.
Consent to a magistrate judge's authority. The following parties consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all proceedings m hit case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all port-trial proceedings.
Parties' printed names Signatures of parties or attorneys Dates
Reference Order
IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to a United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.
Date:
District Judge's signatures
Printed name and tide
Note: Return this form to the clerk of court only if you are consenting to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States magistrate judge. Do not return this form to a judge.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES: REFERRALS AND CONSENTS
All cases in the Southern District of New York are assigned to two judges: a district judge and a magistrate judge. District fudges are appointed for life terms by the President. Magistrate fudges are selected by a majority vote of the district judges in the particular district and serve terms of eight years.
Referrals to the Magistrate Judge. The district judge assigned to your case may refer the case to a magistrate fudge for specific purposes. Commonly. the referral nil be for the magistrate judge to conduct the proceedings that occur before trial, such as resolving discovery disputes or presiding qua' settlement conferences. A referral may also be made for the magistrate fudge to issue to the district judge a report and recommendation on hove to resolve a motion, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment. The consent of the parties is not needed for the district judge to refer the case to the magistrate judge for these purposes. If the district judge has made such a referral, you can ask the district fudge to review any magistrate judge's decision by filing an objection with the district judge within four teen days of that decision. The district fudge will rule on any timely objections that you file. If you do not file an objection, you will give up your right to challenge the magistrate judge's decision at a later time,, including on appeal. See Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Consent to Proceed Before the Magistrate Judge. If you would like your case to move more quickly, it is helpful to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes, including any trial. If you consent, the magistrate fudge will perform the identical function that the district judge would have performed. Any trial in your case would be either a jury or a nonjury trial, depending upon whether there is a right to a jury trial and a proper request for such a trial. The only difference is that the magistrate judge - and not the district judge - would preside over that trial Cases that proceed for all purposes before a magistrate judge generally move more quickly than cases before a district fudge. If you consent to proceed before die magistrate judge, the district fudge plays no further role in the case. Any appeal is taken directly to the Court of Appeals. It is your choice whether or not to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge, and all parties must consent or the case will not proceed before die magistrate judge.
A copy of the appropriate consent form is attached. Additional forms are also available from the Pro Se Intake Unit and on the Court's website.