From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Cosmo v. Forst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 22, 2014
135 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 1D13–4298.

2014-04-22

Joseph A. DE COSMO, Petitioner, v. Maureen M. FORST, Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. Joseph A. De Cosmo, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
Joseph A. De Cosmo, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that the trial court has failed to timely consider and rule upon any pending pleading or motion after having that matter called up for hearing and disposition. Petitioner has therefore failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Smartt v. First Union Nat. Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We DENY the petition accordingly. LEWIS, C.J., PADOVANO and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

De Cosmo v. Forst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Apr 22, 2014
135 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

De Cosmo v. Forst

Case Details

Full title:Joseph A. DE COSMO, Petitioner, v. Maureen M. FORST, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

135 So. 3d 1163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)