From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D.C. v. Oakdale Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [FRESNO DIVISION]
Jul 12, 2012
No. 1:11 CV-01112-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:11 CV-01112-AWI-DLB

07-12-2012

D.C., by and through his parent and guardian ad litem, T.C. and T.C. individually Plaintiffs, v. OAKDALE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT et. al. Defendants.

EVAN GOLDSEN Attorney for Plaintiffs JOHN P. KELLEY Attorney for Defendants


STIPULATION FOR REFERRAL TO

VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION

PROGRAM AND ORDER


(Local Rule 271 (i))

The parties, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and request the Court order, pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 271 (i), referral to the Court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. The parties request the VDRP Administrator supply a list of three potential Neutrals pursuant to Local Rule 271(e)(3), the Neutral be selected on or before July 2, 2012, the process be completed by August 31, 2012, and the Neutral file a confirmation of completion by September 14, 2012. No modification or additions to the existing Scheduling Order is requested at this time. The parties do not foresee any discovery or motions that need to be completed before the VDRP session is held nor do the parties require any discovery or motions be stayed until the VDRP session is concluded.

By: ______________

EVAN GOLDSEN

Attorney for Plaintiffs

HALKIDES, MORGAN & KELLEY

By: ______________

JOHN P. KELLEY

Attorney for Defendants
Through administrative oversight, the Court has only now become aware of the parties' stipulation. The Court shall give effect to all stipulated dates except for July 2, 2012, which has already passed. The VDRP Administrator is hereby ordered to supply a list of three potential Neutrals for selection by the parties. If, after selection of the Neutral, the August 31 and September 14 dates are no longer feasible, the parties shall file an amended stipulation with revised dates. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

D.C. v. Oakdale Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [FRESNO DIVISION]
Jul 12, 2012
No. 1:11 CV-01112-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2012)
Case details for

D.C. v. Oakdale Joint Unified Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:D.C., by and through his parent and guardian ad litem, T.C. and T.C…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA [FRESNO DIVISION]

Date published: Jul 12, 2012

Citations

No. 1:11 CV-01112-AWI-DLB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 12, 2012)