From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daylight Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1970
179 S.E.2d 542 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

45733.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1970.

DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1970.

Action on account. Charlton Superior Court. Before Judge Hodges.

Schreiber Rozier, Joe Schreiber, for appellant.

Harrison Laseter, John R. Laseter, for appellees.


Daylight Industries, Inc., d/b/a Daylight Grocery Company, sued W. R. Allen, Jr. and J. C. Adams as individuals for the unpaid balance due on an account. The defendants moved to dismiss the action, alleging as ground 3 that the "Obligation, if any, owed to the plaintiff is owed by Adams Wholesale Meats and Provisions, Inc., a Georgia Corporation ... and not owed by defendants individually." After hearing evidence on the motion the trial judge sustained this ground of the motion and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff appeals from this order. Held:

The motion, as considered by the trial judge after hearing evidence, must be treated as a motion for summary judgment. CPA § 12 (c); Code Ann. § 81A-112 (c); Smith v. Smith, 119 Ga. App. 803, 805 ( 168 S.E.2d 878). The evidence discloses a genuine issue of fact as to whether the alleged indebtedness is that of the two individual defendants, or that of another, or more precisely, the corporation which the defendants own. This is a jury question, and the trial judge erred in disposing of the issue by action tantamount to the grant of a summary judgment.

Judgment reversed. Eberhardt and Pannell, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 2, 1970 — DECIDED DECEMBER 3, 1970.


Summaries of

Daylight Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 3, 1970
179 S.E.2d 542 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

Daylight Industries, Inc. v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:DAYLIGHT INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ALLEN et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Dec 3, 1970

Citations

179 S.E.2d 542 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970)
179 S.E.2d 542

Citing Cases

Owens v. Griggs

However, by granting defendant's motion to dismiss after hearing evidence, the motion must be treated as a…

Newsrack Supply, Inc. v. Heinle

1. On the hearing on the motion to dismiss the complaint because of failure to state a claim, evidence was…