From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dayberry v. Long

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
4:23-cv-01035-LPR-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-01035-LPR-JTK

07-08-2024

JIM DAYBERRY ADC #653942 PLAINTIFF v. BRANDON LONG, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (PRD) from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Doc. 27). No objections have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the PRD, along with careful consideration of the entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the PRD as its findings and conclusions in all respects.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Crystal Stripling are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of service. The Clerk is directed to terminate Crystal Stripling as a party to this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Dayberry v. Long

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 8, 2024
4:23-cv-01035-LPR-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)
Case details for

Dayberry v. Long

Case Details

Full title:JIM DAYBERRY ADC #653942 PLAINTIFF v. BRANDON LONG, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 8, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-01035-LPR-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 8, 2024)