From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Warden Lieber Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 29, 2016
No. 16-6449 (4th Cir. Jun. 29, 2016)

Opinion

No. 16-6449

06-29-2016

MICHEAL DWIGHT DAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent - Appellee.

Micheal Dwight Day, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (5:14-cv-04318-BHH) Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Micheal Dwight Day, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Micheal Dwight Day seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Day that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Day has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Day v. Warden Lieber Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 29, 2016
No. 16-6449 (4th Cir. Jun. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Day v. Warden Lieber Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:MICHEAL DWIGHT DAY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 29, 2016

Citations

No. 16-6449 (4th Cir. Jun. 29, 2016)