From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Teper

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

01-27-2016

Stacey DAY, et al., respondents, v. Ira TEPER, et al., appellants.

Weiner, Millo, Morgan & Bonanno, LLC, New York, N.Y. (John P. Bonanno and David J. Skochil of counsel), for appellants. Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Jesse M. Minc of counsel), for respondents.


Weiner, Millo, Morgan & Bonanno, LLC, New York, N.Y. (John P. Bonanno and David J. Skochil of counsel), for appellants.

Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Jesse M. Minc of counsel), for respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walker, J.), dated October 10, 2014, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There are issues of fact requiring denial of summary judgment.

BALKIN, J.P., HALL, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Day v. Teper

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 27, 2016
135 A.D.3d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Day v. Teper

Case Details

Full title:Stacey DAY, et al., respondents, v. Ira TEPER, et al., appellants.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

135 A.D.3d 895 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
135 A.D.3d 895
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 472