From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 20, 2001
793 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 1D00-530I.

Opinion filed July 20, 2001. Rehearing Denied September 10, 2001.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Larry G. Turner, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; Edgar Lee Elzie, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Thomas D. Winokur, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant was convicted of burglary of a dwelling, dealing in stolen property, grand theft, and uttering. The state correctly concedes that Appellant's conviction of grand theft was contrary to section 812.025, Florida Statutes (1999), which prohibits an individual from being convicted of both grand theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme. Accordingly, we affirm the convictions for burglary, dealing in stolen property and uttering, but vacate the conviction for grand theft and remand for correction to the sentence to reflect that the grand theft conviction is vacated. See Golden v. State, 688 So.2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We affirm on all other issues on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

BARFIELD, DAVIS and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Day v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 20, 2001
793 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Day v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY DAY, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 20, 2001

Citations

793 So. 2d 68 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Lutz v. State

In accordance with the controlling precedents in our own district, we affirm the conviction and HFO sentence…

Blackmon v. State

This court followed Ridley in Alexander v. State, 470 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), and we have continued to…