From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 6, 2006
28 A.D.3d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8153.

April 6, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered February 23, 2005, which, in an action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident, granted defendant's postanswer motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, and denied plaintiff's cross motion to dismiss defendant's affirmative defense of the statute of limitations, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Scott Gilman, New York, for appellant.

Paul F. McAloon, New York, for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.


Defendant's answer asserted the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense. Assuming, without deciding, that the answer was late, we would deem it timely interposed under the circumstances presented (CPLR 3012 [d]). Accordingly, the action was properly dismissed as time-barred.


Summaries of

Day v. Rudolph

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 6, 2006
28 A.D.3d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Day v. Rudolph

Case Details

Full title:JACQUELINE DAY, Appellant, v. MICHAEL RUDOLPH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 6, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 232 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2617
811 N.Y.S.2d 566