From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2009
Case No. 3:07-cv-122-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-122-KRG-KAP.

August 11, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 21, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3), and Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on June 19, 2009, docket no. 25, recommending that the petitioner's motion be denied. The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed timely objections, docket no. 26, which I have considered but reject.

After de novo review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2009, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. A certificate of appealability is still denied.

Notice by ECF to counsel of record and by U.S. Mail to:

Michael F. Day CX-7073
S.C.I. Houtzdale
P.O. Box 1000
Houtzdale, PA 16698-1000


Summaries of

Day v. Patrick

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 11, 2009
Case No. 3:07-cv-122-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Day v. Patrick

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL F. DAY, Petitioner v. WARDEN GEORGE PATRICK, S.C.I. HOUTZDALE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 11, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-122-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

Day v. Klinefelter

Day cannot use a Rule 60 motion to reopen the habeas proceedings at Day v. Patrick, Case no.…