From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 3, 2012
ACTION NO. 2:11cv79 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2012)

Opinion

ACTION NO. 2:11cv79

01-03-2012

CLYDE OWEN DAY, JR., No. 1177017/176167, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent.


FINAL ORDER

This matter was initiated by petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition alleges violation of federal rights pertaining to petitioner's conviction for incest on April 12, 2005, in the Circuit Court of the City of Fredericksburg, Virginia, as a result of which he was sentenced to serve 20 years in prison.

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and (C) and Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The Report and Recommendation filed November 17, 2011, recommends dismissal of the petition. Each party was advised of his right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. On December 5, 2011, the Court received petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation. The respondent filed no response to the objections and the time for responding has now expired.

The Court, having reviewed the record and examined the objections filed by petitioner to the Report and Recommendation, and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed November 17, 2011. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and the Petitioner's petition be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," therefore, the Court declines to issue any certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039 (2003).

Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of this court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of such judgment.

The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to petitioner and counsel of record for respondent.

____________

REBECCA BEACH SMITH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Norfolk, Virginia

December 30, 2011


Summaries of

Day v. Clarke

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division
Jan 3, 2012
ACTION NO. 2:11cv79 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Day v. Clarke

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE OWEN DAY, JR., No. 1177017/176167, Petitioner, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division

Date published: Jan 3, 2012

Citations

ACTION NO. 2:11cv79 (E.D. Va. Jan. 3, 2012)

Citing Cases

Grafmuller v. Clarke

Where denial on direct appeal is itself based on an adequate and independent state procedural rule, Henry may…