From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Porch.com

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 28, 2023
2:20-cv-00604-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00604-RSL

02-28-2023

BOB DAWSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PORCH.COM INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND ESTABLISHING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the “Joint Status Report” submitted by the parties. Dkt. # 90. Having reviewed the report and heard the arguments of counsel, the Court finds as follows:

A stay of discovery while the legal issues related to the autodialer claims are resolved is necessary to promote efficiency and avoid undue burden and expense. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Defendants have identified “a real question” regarding the viability of plaintiffs' autodialer claims, and plaintiffs have not shown that they will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981).

Defendants shall, within thirty days of the date of this Order, file their motion to dismiss. The motion shall be noted for consideration by the Court on May 5, 2023.

Defendants shall include in their motion any defense or objection that is currently available to them.


Summaries of

Dawson v. Porch.com

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 28, 2023
2:20-cv-00604-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Dawson v. Porch.com

Case Details

Full title:BOB DAWSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PORCH.COM INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-00604-RSL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 28, 2023)