From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 3, 2023
2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P

01-03-2023

CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed August 19, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint and found that it did not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 22. Plaintiff was given the opportunity to file an amended complaint, but instead indicated that he intended to seek reconsideration of the screening order and requested an extension of time to do so. ECF No. 28. Despite receiving extensions of time to seek reconsideration (ECF Nos. 29, 31), plaintiff has not done so and the deadline to do so has passed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The amended complaint must bear the docket number assigned this case and must be labeled “First Amended Complaint.” Failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Dawson v. Lynch

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 3, 2023
2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Dawson v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS MANWELL DAWSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0510 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2023)