From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Johnson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00466-ZLW-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00466-ZLW-BNB.

December 14, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on Plaintiff Dawson's Motion to Reopen Discovery [Doc. # 119, filed 11/21/2006] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED to the following extent:

(1) The plaintiff may depose each of the defendants and Al Estep, and the defendants may depose the plaintiff. No deposition shall exceed four hours of testimony, and the depositions must be completed on or before February 2, 2007; and

(2) The plaintiff may serve production requests or a subpoena duces tecum, as the parties may agree, for the production of the following:

(a) The plaintiff's inmate file from January 1, 2000, to the present;
(b) All Step I, Step II, and Step III grievances filed by the plaintiff on or after January 1, 2002, and responses thereto;
(c) Documents reflecting all disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiff on or after January 1, 2002;
(d) Copies of all applicable grievance policy and procedures and of the Code of Penal Discipline in effect at the times relevant to the plaintiffs claims; and
(e) Portions of the personnel files of the defendants concerning any discipline or sanctions imposed on them and all performance evaluations and reviews dated on or after January 1, 2000.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that responsive documents shall be provided to plaintiff's counsel on a rolling basis as they become available, but all responsive documents must be produced on or before January 12, 2007.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED in all other respects.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the depositions permitted here may be taken on three days prior written notice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may submit for my review a proposed protective order limiting the use and further disclosure of information, if they believe such a protective order is appropriate. The motion for protective order, if any, must be filed on or before December 18, 2006.


Summaries of

Dawson v. Johnson

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-cv-00466-ZLW-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Dawson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. SHANE JOHNSON, and JOHN BOWKER…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00466-ZLW-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 14, 2006)