From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DAWSON v. HEID BROS

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 14, 1936
94 S.W.2d 201 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)

Opinion

No. 3370.

April 23, 1936. Rehearing Denied May 14, 1936.

Appeal from County Court at Law, El Paso County; John M. Worrell, Judge.

Proceeding between Jack Dawson and Heid Bros., a corporation. From an interlocutory order of the county court appointing a receiver, first-named party appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

William E. Clayton, of El Paso, for appellant.

C. W. Croom, of El Paso, for appellee.


This is an attempted appeal from an interlocutory order of the county court at law of El Paso county appointing a receiver. In the absence of a statute authorizing the same, an appeal will not lie from an interlocutory order. Article 2250, R.S., authorizes an appeal from an interlocutory order of the district court appointing a receiver. By its terms the right of appeal is limited to such orders of the district court. Accordingly, this appeal should be dismissed. Muela v. Moye (Tex. Civ. App.) 185 S.W. 331.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

DAWSON v. HEID BROS

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso
May 14, 1936
94 S.W.2d 201 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)
Case details for

DAWSON v. HEID BROS

Case Details

Full title:DAWSON v. HEID BROS

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, El Paso

Date published: May 14, 1936

Citations

94 S.W.2d 201 (Tex. Civ. App. 1936)

Citing Cases

Davenport v. Wood Motor Co.

This, in view of the fact that appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order of the county court appointing…