From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Baldwin

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Oct 11, 2022
3:19-cv-50058 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

3:19-cv-50058

10-11-2022

Alex James Dawson, Plaintiff, v. John V Baldwin et al, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Lisa A. Jensen, United States Magistrate Judge

Telephonic motion hearing on Plaintiff's motion to reinstate the case for enforcement of settlement [167] held on 10/11/2022. In light of defense counsel's representation that the settlement check will be mailed to Plaintiff's counsel on 10/12/2022, Plaintiff agrees to convert his motion [167] into an oral motion to extend the date to dismiss the case with prejudice to 10/25/2022. Accordingly, it is this Court's report and recommendation that Plaintiff's motion be granted, and the parties' stipulation to dismiss this case [163] [164] would be modified to a dismissal without prejudice, to become a dismissal with prejudice on 10/25/2022 without further action of the Court unless before then Plaintiff files a motion to extend that date. Any objection to this report and recommendation must be filed by 10/25/2022. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). The failure to file a timely objection may result in the waiver of objections on appeal. See Provident Bank v. Manor Steel Corp., 882 F.2d 258, 260-61 (7th Cir. 1989). Signed by the Honorable Lisa A. Jensen on 10/11/2022.


Summaries of

Dawson v. Baldwin

United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Oct 11, 2022
3:19-cv-50058 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Dawson v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:Alex James Dawson, Plaintiff, v. John V Baldwin et al, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

3:19-cv-50058 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 11, 2022)