From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Abston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 2, 2014
C/A No. 4:13-cv-1366 DCN (D.S.C. Jun. 2, 2014)

Opinion

C/A No. 4:13-cv-1366 DCN

06-02-2014

William Douglas Dawson, Jr., #248371, Plaintiff, v. Cpt. Rhonda Abston; Warden Michael McCall; Assistant Warden Florence Mauney; and Assistant Warden Denis Bush, Defendants.


ORDER

The above referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted in its entirety and the case dismissed. It is further recommended that all outstanding motions be deemed moot.

This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984 ). Objections to the magistrate judge's report and

In Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985), the court held "that a pro se litigant must receive fair notification of the consequences of failure to object to a magistrate judge's report before such a procedural default will result in waiver of the right to appeal. The notice must be 'sufficiently understandable to one in appellant's circumstances fairly to appraise him of what is required.'" Id. at 846. Plaintiff was advised in a clear manner that his objections had to be filed within ten (10) days, and he received notice of the consequences at the appellate level of his failure to object to the magistrate judge's report.

recommendation were timely filed by plaintiff on May 29, 2104.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and the case is hereby DISMISSED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all outstanding motions are deemed MOOT.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

David C. Norton

United States District Judge
June 2, 2014
Charleston, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified that any right to appeal this Order is governed by Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure


Summaries of

Dawson v. Abston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 2, 2014
C/A No. 4:13-cv-1366 DCN (D.S.C. Jun. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Dawson v. Abston

Case Details

Full title:William Douglas Dawson, Jr., #248371, Plaintiff, v. Cpt. Rhonda Abston…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 2, 2014

Citations

C/A No. 4:13-cv-1366 DCN (D.S.C. Jun. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. Abston

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by…

Bowers v. Nix

Such allegations are insufficient to establish a claim. See Dawson v. Abston, No. CA 4:13-cv-1366-DCN, 2014…