From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawn v. Kelland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1947
271 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

March 7, 1947.

Present — Martin, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.


Since the demised premises may need to be used as a dwelling as part of their use for a kindergarten boarding school, the question whether the latter was the exclusive purpose of the letting is left to the trial. (Cf. Byrnes v. Balcom, 265 App. Div. 268, affd. 290 N.Y. 730; Robitzek Investing Co. v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co., 265 App. Div. 749.) The second cause of action charging defendants with damages for fraud is regarded as alleging an affirmative misrepresentation that the premises could be used for a kindergarten boarding school with knowledge that such use was prohibited by the local zoning ordinance. So construed, the complaint alleges more than concealment of a material fact by defendants. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Dawn v. Kelland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 7, 1947
271 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Dawn v. Kelland

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES DAWN, Respondent, v. BETTY S. KELLAND et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 7, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)