From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawn S. v. Michael L. Y. (In re Proceeding for Custody/Visitation)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 1, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 80556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

Motion No: M-3482

10-01-2019

In the Matter of a Proceeding for Custody/Visitation Under Article 6 of the Family Court Act. Dawn S., Petitioner-Appellant, Docket Nos. V-510-13 V-510-13/15A v. V-510-13/16B V-19184-13/16A Michael L. Y., V-32171-13/16A Respondent-Respondent. In the Matter of a Proceeding for Custody/Visitation Under Article 6 of the Family Court Act. Michael L. Y.,CONFIDENTIAL Petitioner-Appellant, Docket Nos. V-19184-13 V-32171-13 v. Dawn S., Respondent-Respondent.

Carmen Restivo, Esq., Attorney for the Children.


CONFIDENTIAL

Carmen Restivo, Esq., Attorney for the Children.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by petitioner-appellant/respondent-respondent mother from the order of the Family Court, New York County, entered on or about May 24, 2018, which granted the father sole custody of the subject children,And an order of this Court having been entered on

February 10, 2019 (M-6645), inter alia, granting petitioner-appellant/respondent-respondent mother leave to prosecute the aforesaid appeal as a poor person, as well as leave to respond the appeal taken by movant father, and assigning Randall S. Carmel, Esq., as counsel to prosecute the appeal, And an order of the Family Court, New York County, having been entered on or about May 15, 2019, in which the Court, after reviewing petitioner-appellant/respondent-respondent mother's 2018 tax return and a financial disclosure affidavit, noted that her income "far exceeds the maximum income... to qualif[y] for free court-appointed counsel" and, as a result, denied the mother's application for free court-appointed counsel due to her ineligibility,And respondent-respondent/petitioner-appellant father having moved, by assigned counsel, to relieve the assigned appellate counsel afforded to petitioner-appellant/respondent-respondent mother by this Court, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted, and assigned counsel Randall S. Carmel, Esq., is relieved as counsel on her appeal, as well as on respondent-respondent/petitioner-appellant father's appeal.

ENTERED: October 1, 2019

__________ CLERK

Present - Hon. Judith J. Gische,Justice Presiding, Jeffrey K. Oing Anil C. Singh Peter H. Moulton,Justices

M-3482


Summaries of

Dawn S. v. Michael L. Y. (In re Proceeding for Custody/Visitation)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Oct 1, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 80556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Dawn S. v. Michael L. Y. (In re Proceeding for Custody/Visitation)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of a Proceeding for Custody/Visitation Under Article 6 of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 1, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 80556 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)