From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawn D. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 4, 2020
CIVIL NO. 1:19-CV-350-DBH (D. Me. May. 4, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:19-CV-350-DBH

05-04-2020

DAWN D., PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 18, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. After extension, the time within which to file objections expired on May 1, 2020, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The administrative decision is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 4TH DAY OF MAY, 2020

/s/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Dawn D. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
May 4, 2020
CIVIL NO. 1:19-CV-350-DBH (D. Me. May. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Dawn D. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DAWN D., PLAINTIFF v. ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: May 4, 2020

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:19-CV-350-DBH (D. Me. May. 4, 2020)

Citing Cases

Keith C v. Kijakazi

D. Me. Mar. 18, 2020), R. & R. adopted, Civil No. 1:19-cv-350-DBH, 2020 WL 2114355 (D. Me. May 4,…