From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawkins v. Dawkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1965
172 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Summary

noting that "fair and equitable agreements which are not violative of public policy may be incorporated into a divorce decree"

Summary of this case from Webb v. Webb

Opinion

No. 4129.

February 24, 1965. Rehearing Denied March 22, 1965.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County, Otis Farrington, J.

Buckley Bland, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


The appellant, husband-defendant below, appeals a decree of divorce which incorporated therein all the provisions of a separation and property settlement agreement between the parties except a part in which the wife waived alimony. The court found that under the circumstances the rejected part of the agreement was "unfair and over-reaching," refused to preclude alimony and retained jurisdiction on that question.

We reject appellant's contention that the chancellor was bound to accept the separation agreement in its entirety and we affirm.

Fla. Stat. § 65.08, F.S.A., vests in the chancellor the sole discretion to settle questions relative to alimony and the parties may not by contract divest him of this discretion. Although fair and equitable agreements which are not violative of public policy may be incorporated into a divorce decree, there is no statute or rule of law which says they must be.

In ruling on this point the District Court in Florida National Bank Trust Co. at Miami v. United States, D.C.S.D. 1960, 182 F. Supp. 76, said that under Fla. Stat. § 65.08, F.S.A., and the decisions in Florida:

"[The] judge in divorce [case] is given full power at the time he enters initial divorce decree to fix rights of parties, court has right to approve of a prior separation agreement or modify or disapprove of it in its entirety and once it is approved, it becomes the order of the court and decree becomes basis for settlement."

This discretion of the chancellor in making an alimony award in the initial decree under Fla. Stat. § 65.08, F.S.A., should not be confused with the power of the court to modify a divorce decree which incorporated such an agreement under Fla. Stat. § 65.15, F.S.A.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C.J., ALLEN, J., and HENSLEY, ROBERT E., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Dawkins v. Dawkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 22, 1965
172 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

noting that "fair and equitable agreements which are not violative of public policy may be incorporated into a divorce decree"

Summary of this case from Webb v. Webb
Case details for

Dawkins v. Dawkins

Case Details

Full title:J.C. DAWKINS, APPELLANT, v. MARY ESTHER DAWKINS, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 22, 1965

Citations

172 So. 2d 633 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Posner v. Posner

"In every decree of divorce in a suit by the wife, the court shall make such orders touching the maintenance,…

Gelfo v. Gelfo

It has previously been held that when in a divorce proceeding the chancellor finds a provision in a…