From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawkins v. Aramark, Washington Jefferson College

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 6, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1342 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-1342.

April 6, 2010


ORDER


The above captioned case was filed on October 5, 2009, and was assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan. Upon the filing of a notice of District Judge Option (Doc. No. 24), Judge Nora Barry Fischer was assigned and the case was referred back to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33), on February 18, 2010, that recommended the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by the Defendant Washington and Jefferson College be granted in part with regards to Count 1 and II and denied in part with regard to Court III. The Defendant filed timely Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 35) on March 4, 2010. The Magistrate Judge then filed a Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 39) on March 12, 2010, that recommended that Defendant Washington and Jefferson College's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 8) be granted. It was further recommended that Plaintiff's prematurely-filed Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 36) be stricken as moot. The parties were advised they were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file written objections to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Washington and Jefferson College's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 26), prematurely-filed on March 7, 2010, is STRICKEN AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated February 18, 2010, is TERMINATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 39) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated March 12, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Dawkins v. Aramark, Washington Jefferson College

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 6, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-1342 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Dawkins v. Aramark, Washington Jefferson College

Case Details

Full title:BRANDI L. DAWKINS, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, WASHINGTON AND JEFFERSON…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-1342 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2010)