From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1931
135 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)

Opinion

8 Div. 266, 267.

June 30, 1931.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; A. E. Hawkins, Judge.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.


This case was tried before the judge sitting without a jury. After hearing the evidence the trial judge was of the opinion that both defendants were guilty of petit larceny, and rendered judgment accordingly.

The case was submitted in this court on motion of the Attorney General, without brief or argument by appellant supporting exceptions reserved on the trial.

We have examined the record for errors as required by the statute, and find none of a reversible nature. An opinion in the case is unnecessary, and, without promulgating one, we follow the rule laid down in Simmons v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Winford v. State, 17 Ala. App. 153, 82 So. 643; Chapman v. State. 17 Ala. App. 154, 82 So. 644.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Dawes v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1931
135 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
Case details for

Dawes v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. C. DAWES and Emmett Gillespie v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1931

Citations

135 So. 921 (Ala. Crim. App. 1931)
24 Ala. App. 629