From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawburn v. Martin

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)


The plaintiff, an attorney of the court, brought a suit against the defendant for saying these words of him: Thou art *a knave upon record, a forgering knave, and he was found guilty, and £ 6 damages were given. And

Jermyn moved in arrest of judgment, that the words are not actionable. If he had said: Thou art a forging attorney, no doubt the action would lie, as if a man says of a Judge: Thou art a corrupt Judge, an action lies. But here it does not appear that there was any communication or any discourse of the plaintiff as an attorney. And the word Knave is no slander; for I have heard Lord Coke say that knave in the Saxon language signifies merely an evil child. 18 Jac. Sir William Broker alleged that he was nobly born, and I. S. said of him: Thou art a cousener, and dost live by cousening: held not actionable. And he said, there is no such a word as forgering. If one says to another: Thou art an outfooter, which in Cumberland signifies a thief, it is not actionable here.

The parties made the matter up; so the court did not speak to it. But JONES, J., said, 28 El.: Judge Francis' brother said: Thou hast forged my father's will to deceive me. Held actionable. Palmer, 441; Poph., 177; 2 Cr., 427.


Summaries of

Dawburn v. Martin

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Dawburn v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:DAWBURN v. MARTIN. — Pasch. 2 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 646 (N.C. 1793)