From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 16, 1931
54 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1931)

Summary

In Davison v. Commissioner, 54 F.2d 1077, we affirmed a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in a case which differed from this one only in that the partnership and the deceased partner both kept their books and filed returns on the calendar year basis.

Summary of this case from Darcy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Opinion

No. 63.

November 16, 1931.

Appeal from the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

Charles E. Hotchkiss, Sydney G. Soons, and J. Sterling Halstead, all of New York City, for petitioners.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., and James K. Polk, Jr., Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


Decision affirmed.


Summaries of

Davison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 16, 1931
54 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1931)

In Davison v. Commissioner, 54 F.2d 1077, we affirmed a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in a case which differed from this one only in that the partnership and the deceased partner both kept their books and filed returns on the calendar year basis.

Summary of this case from Darcy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Case details for

Davison v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Clarence B. DAVISON, as Surviving Executor of the Last WILL and Testament…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 16, 1931

Citations

54 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir. 1931)

Citing Cases

Darcy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Hughes v. Commissioner (C.C.A.) 38 F.2d 755, 757. Obviously, the petitioners could not show that the amount…