From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Heil

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 27, 1975
346 A.2d 405 (N.J. 1975)

Opinion

Argued October 6, 1975 —

Decided October 27, 1975.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Joseph T. Maloney, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent-appellant ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Mark A. Gennette, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Mr. Gerald D. Miller argued the cause for the appellant-respondent ( Messrs. Miller, Hochman, Meyerson and Miller, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Davis v. Heil

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Oct 27, 1975
346 A.2d 405 (N.J. 1975)
Case details for

Davis v. Heil

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DAVIS a/k/a JOSEPH McEACHIN, APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, v. NICHOLAS D…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Oct 27, 1975

Citations

346 A.2d 405 (N.J. 1975)
346 A.2d 405

Citing Cases

Cain v. New Jersey State Parole Board

The aggregates of the terms imposed were: Donald Cain, 36 months; Anthony Fabro, 36 months; Donald…

Windmill Estates v. Zoning Bd. of Adj., Totowa

The term "reasonable interim zoning ordinance" is not defined in the new act. It is, however, axiomatic that…