From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Worthen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-365(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-365(MTT)

02-27-2012

CEDRICK R. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. LADERICK WORTHEN, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 12). The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because the Plaintiff has failed to both comply with the Court's orders and to diligently prosecute his action. The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED, this 27th day of February, 2012.

_________________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Davis v. Worthen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-365(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Worthen

Case Details

Full title:CEDRICK R. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. LADERICK WORTHEN, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-365(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)