Opinion
No. CIV S-05-1628 FCD PAN P.
August 10, 2006
ORDER
On August 7, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed July 28, 2006, dismissing plaintiff's amended complaint with leave to amend. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed July 28, 2006, is affirmed.