From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Williams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1978
379 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1978)

Opinion

Submitted May 1, 1978

Decided June 6, 1978

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HILDA G. SCHWARTZ, J.

Bradley B. Davis, appellant pro se, and for Carol Rosenwald, appellant.

Joseph D. Ahearn for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The anonymous advertisement requesting persons with specified grievances against defendant Consolidated Edison Co. to make contact with plaintiff Davis, a lawyer, provided defendants with probable cause to request investigation by the Committee on Grievances of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. The facts of justification for defendants' actions, explicitly stated in the complaint, required dismissal of the complaint. None of plaintiffs' purported causes of action may stand so long as defendants' actions were justified. As the Appellate Division noted "no cause of action whatever has been spelled out, nor is anything shown in the motion papers demonstrating that it can be."

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Williams

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1978
379 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1978)
Case details for

Davis v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY B. DAVIS et al., Appellants, v. ERNEST J. WILLIAMS et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 6, 1978

Citations

379 N.E.2d 158 (N.Y. 1978)
379 N.E.2d 158
407 N.Y.S.2d 630

Citing Cases

Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit CORP.-MK

The pertinent inquiry in the case is whether Messinger's intention was to harm Rodgers; whether the action…

Kaufman v. International Business Machines Corp.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the…