From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Webster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 31, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-3128 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-3128

10-31-2017

JOHN D. DAVIS, (TDCJ #1585531) Plaintiff, v. ANGELA R. WEBSTER, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The plaintiff, John D. Davis, is presently incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutions Division. Davis filed this suit against attorney Angela R. Webster, as well as the named partners of her law firm Parsons McEntire McCleary & Clark, PLLC, seeking compensatory and punitive damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket Entry No. 2). Because Davis is incarcerated, the Court is required to scrutinize the pleadings and dismiss the case if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). After reviewing all of the pleadings as required, the Court concludes this case must be dismissed for reasons that follow.

I. Discussion

Although difficult to ascertain, Davis appears to contend that he filed a grievance against attorney Jim S. Adler. According to Davis, Adler hired the law firm of Parsons McEntire McCleary & Clark, PLLC, to represent him in the grievance process. Defendant Webster filed a response to Davis's grievance, which Davis alleges "shows inconsistencies in the exhibits that they altered, manipulated, malliciously (sic) tampered with no valid justification or substance to create confusion to make a mockery out of the judicial system . . . ." (Docket Entry No. 1, at 4).

To establish liability under section 1983, a civil rights plaintiff must satisfy two elements: (1) state action, i.e., that the conduct complained of was committed under color of state law, and (2) a resulting violation of federal law, i.e., that the conduct deprived the plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. See Collins v. City of Harker Heights, 503 U.S. 115, 120 (1992); Baker v. McCollan, 443 U.S. 137, 142 (1979). In other words, "the party charged with the deprivation must be a person who may fairly be said to be a state actor," that is, one who is in fact a state official, one who "has acted together with or has obtained significant aid from state officials," or one whose "conduct is otherwise chargeable to the State." Lugar v. Edmundson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 936(1982).

The defendants in this case are private actors, not state actors. Accordingly, because Davis's pleadings do not implicate any state action, his allegations against the defendants fail to state a claim under section 1983 as a matter of law. This case is therefore subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim.

II. Conclusion and Order

Based on the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket Entry No. 2), is GRANTED.

2. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The dismissal constitutes a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. The TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund is ORDERED to deduct funds from the trust account of John Davis (TDCJ #1585531) and forward them to the Clerk on a regular basis, in compliance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), until the entire filing fee ($350.00) has been paid.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the plaintiff. The Clerk will also provide a copy by regular mail, facsimile transmission, or e-mail to: (1) the TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas, 78711, Fax Number (512) 936-2159; and (2) the Manager of the Three-Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas, at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.

SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on OCT 31 2017.

/s/_________

ALFRED H. BENNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Webster

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 31, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-3128 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Davis v. Webster

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. DAVIS, (TDCJ #1585531) Plaintiff, v. ANGELA R. WEBSTER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-cv-3128 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2017)