From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Warden Sam Law

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
May 28, 2009
No. CV-09-45-GF-SEH (D. Mont. May. 28, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-09-45-GF-SEH.

May 28, 2009


ORDER


On May 12, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered his Findings and Recommendation in this matter. Plaintiff filed objections on May 20, 2009 and May 26, 2009. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Document No. 4

Document Nos. 6 and 7

Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation and adopt them in full.

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Document No. 1

2. The filing of this action counts as one strike for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith as Plaintiff has not alleged a viable claim under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3).


Summaries of

Davis v. Warden Sam Law

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
May 28, 2009
No. CV-09-45-GF-SEH (D. Mont. May. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Davis v. Warden Sam Law

Case Details

Full title:ROGER WILLIAM DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN SAM LAW, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division

Date published: May 28, 2009

Citations

No. CV-09-45-GF-SEH (D. Mont. May. 28, 2009)