From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 3, 2011
Case No. 2:05-CV-01179-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:05-CV-01179-KJD-(RJJ).

August 3, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (#53). The court has reviewed it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Respondents will need to respond to it.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the third amended petition (#53). If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.


Summaries of

Davis v. Warden

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 3, 2011
Case No. 2:05-CV-01179-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY EUGENE DAVIS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:05-CV-01179-KJD-(RJJ) (D. Nev. Aug. 3, 2011)