From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Vilsack

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Oct 7, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-907 DB-BCW (D. Utah Oct. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-907 DB-BCW

10-07-2016

SHARON DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. TOM VILSACK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on September 12, 2016, recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, and that the Court provide Plaintiff with 30 days from the date of this Order to cure the deficiencies outlined in the Report and Recommendation. Specifically, Plaintiff's failure to plead personal jurisdiction or venue in this district.

The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an objection.

Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and and DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint, without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this Order to cure the jurisdictional deficiencies set forth above and outlined in the Report and Recommendation. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure these deficiencies within 30 days the action shall be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 7th day of October, 2016.

/s/_________

Dee Benson

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Vilsack

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Oct 7, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-907 DB-BCW (D. Utah Oct. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Davis v. Vilsack

Case Details

Full title:SHARON DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. TOM VILSACK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-907 DB-BCW (D. Utah Oct. 7, 2016)