From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146(MTT)

06-06-2012

PATRICK DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. STEVE UPTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 5). The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing Defendant John Doe Cert Officer because the Plaintiff failed to identify said Defendant prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The Magistrate Judge also recommends dismissing without prejudice Defendants Floyd, Upton, Johnson, and Moore. The Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 10). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff's objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects.

The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. Defendant John Doe Cert Officer is dismissed from this action. Further, Defendants Floyd, Upton, Johnson, and Moore are dismissed without prejudice.

_________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Davis v. Upton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Upton

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. STEVE UPTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146(MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jun. 6, 2012)