From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jan 9, 1942
125 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1942)

Opinion

No. 8867.

January 9, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Edward J. Moinet, Judge.

Jean Davis, alias Jean Marcus, alias Mrs. John Morris was convicted of violating the mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338, and she appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

James A. Jameson, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

John C. Lehr, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.


Upon an appeal from a judgment and sentence under the Mail Fraud Statute, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338, the sole question raised by the appellant is that the letter in evidence deposited in the United States mails was not so deposited until after the consummation of the fraud; that in consequence the offense was not cognizable under the statute and that the District Court was without jurisdiction to try the offender.

It appearing, however, that a reasonable inference from the tenor of the letter, is that it is in continuance of the fraud, or for the purpose of aiding in the retention of its fruits, to lull the victim into a false sense of security and to postpone the taking of action with respect to his loss, and to delay discovery, Therefore,

Upon the authority of Bogy v. United States, 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 734, and Preeman v. United States, 7 Cir., 244 F. 1, the judgment in the above cause is hereby affirmed and the sentence therein imposed sustained.


Summaries of

Davis v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jan 9, 1942
125 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1942)
Case details for

Davis v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jan 9, 1942

Citations

125 F.2d 144 (6th Cir. 1942)

Citing Cases

United States v. Guterma

"The words `in furtherance of' as applied to the scheme may be established only when the scheme is still in…

Gordon v. United States

We of course recognize the correctness of the general proposition advanced by the Government. Where the use…