Opinion
23-3191-JWL
09-05-2023
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner's latest pro se filings, which the Court has carefully reviewed and liberally construes as motions. Over the course of the documents, Petitioner asks this Court to enter orders relating to service, default judgment, summary judgment, judgment on the pleadings, and the production of transcripts, and he declares that he is withholding consent for these proceedings to involve a magistrate judge (Docs. 16, 17, and 18.) These motions will be denied because, as has been repeatedly explained to Petitioner, this case will not proceed unless he pays the full filing fee on or before September 11, 2023. (See Docs. 4, 8.) Thus, all of the orders Petitioner seeks through the current motions are premature.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's motions (Docs. 16, 17, and 18) are denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: This 5th day of September, 2023, at Kansas City, Kansas.