Opinion
1:22CV660 1:13CR51-2
08-17-2022
MARVIN ORLANDO DAVIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.
RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
L. PATRICK AULD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Petitioner, a federal prisoner, submitted a Letter (Docket Entry 190) in which he states that he seeks to attack the conviction or sentence he received in this Court. The document he filed is not a recognizable method for achieving this goal. Instead, the proper avenue for such an attack is ordinarily a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For this reason, the Court will construe the submission as such a motion. However, the Motion cannot be further processed because court records reveal that Petitioner previously attacked the same conviction or sentence in a prior § 2255 Motion [No 1:16CV433]. Consequently, Petitioner must move in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for an order authorizing this district court to consider the current Motion, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and 28 U.S.C. § 2244. See AO 243 (MDNC 10/07), Instructions, ¶ (4) (copy enclosed). Because of this pleading failure, this particular Motion should be filed and then dismissed.
Petitioner also makes a request for counsel. That request will be denied in light of the recommendation of dismissal, but without prejudice to Petitioner filing a motion seeking appointment of counsel if he receives authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion and does so.
IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and then dismissed sua sponte for failure to obtain certification for this § 2255 application by filing a Motion for Authorization in the court of appeals as required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244 and Fourth Circuit Local Rule 22(d) and that, there being no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability not issue.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's request for counsel is denied without prejudice in ligth of the recommendation of dismssal and that the Clerk send Petitioner a copy of this Recommendation, instruction forms for filing § 2255 motions in this Court and Motions for Authorization in the court of appeals, and four copies of § 2255 motion forms (more copies will be sent on request). Petitioner should keep the original and two copies of the § 2255 motion which can be submitted in this Court if Petitioner obtains approval from the Fourth Circuit.