From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 18, 1986
518 A.2d 712 (D.C. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-121.

December 18, 1986.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, and the motion of Public Defender Service for leave to file brief as amicus curiae in support of petition for rehearing en banc, and the lodged brief; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that the motion of Public Defender Service for leave to file brief as amicus curiae is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged brief of amicus curiae. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of May 20, 1986, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this case for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before December 29, 1986.

Associate Judges TERRY and STEADMAN have recused from participating in this case.


Summaries of

Davis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Dec 18, 1986
518 A.2d 712 (D.C. 1986)
Case details for

Davis v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Milton Lee DAVIS, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 18, 1986

Citations

518 A.2d 712 (D.C. 1986)

Citing Cases

Jones v. U.S.

In short, before ruling, he must decide whether the totality of the circumstances provides a realistic…

Davis v. U.S.

Stated another way, we must decide what standard of review we should apply in those unusual cases where the…