From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Uddin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
2:22-cv-0864 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-0864 DB P

12-05-2023

MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MESKATH UDDIN, Defendant.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his Fourth and Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file a response to defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff requests a sixty-day extension of time to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) In support of the motion, plaintiff states that he is experiencing delays in receiving mail and needs time to obtain copies. Good cause appearing, the court will grant the motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 34) is granted; and

2. He shall file an opposition on or before January 5, 2024.


Summaries of

Davis v. Uddin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
2:22-cv-0864 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Davis v. Uddin

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MESKATH UDDIN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-0864 DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)