From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Tinsley

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv664-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv664-MHT (WO)

11-25-2015

SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. VELMA TINSLEY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's objections (doc. no. 8) are overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 7) is adopted.

(3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

DONE, this the 25th day of November, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Tinsley

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv664-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Davis v. Tinsley

Case Details

Full title:SADAKA DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. VELMA TINSLEY, Defendant.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15cv664-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Nov. 25, 2015)