From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Tilzer

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 2, 2009
558 U.S. 992 (2009)

Summary

In Tilzer, the Kansas Supreme Court held among other matters, that the Tilzer's settlement of their claims against the pharmaceutical companies was an "aggregate settlement" so that Missouri's statutory requirements of disclosures and client consent applied to this defendant.

Summary of this case from Booth v. Davis

Opinion

No. 09–282.

2009-11-2

Grant L. DAVIS, et al., petitioners, v. Jerome S. TILZER, et al.


Case below, Tilzer v. Davis, Bethune & Jones, L.L.C., 288 Kan. 477, 204 P.3d 617.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Kansas denied.


Summaries of

Davis v. Tilzer

Supreme Court of the United States
Nov 2, 2009
558 U.S. 992 (2009)

In Tilzer, the Kansas Supreme Court held among other matters, that the Tilzer's settlement of their claims against the pharmaceutical companies was an "aggregate settlement" so that Missouri's statutory requirements of disclosures and client consent applied to this defendant.

Summary of this case from Booth v. Davis
Case details for

Davis v. Tilzer

Case Details

Full title:Grant L. DAVIS, et al., petitioners, v. Jerome S. TILZER, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Nov 2, 2009

Citations

558 U.S. 992 (2009)
130 S. Ct. 507
175 L. Ed. 2d 349
78 U.S.L.W. 3107

Citing Cases

Wille v. Davis

Tilzer, 204 P.3d at 629. The mandate was issued on June 5, 2009. Defendant Davis petitioned the United States…

Waldon v. Davis

Tilzer, 204 P.3d at 629. The mandate was issued on June 5, 2009. Defendant Davis petitioned the United States…