From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 10, 2022
648 S.W.3d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84258

05-10-2022

Norman Edward DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien Sepher Bhakti De Loyola, Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant. Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent.


Damien Sepher Bhakti De Loyola, Kansas City, Missouri, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent.

Before Division Four: Cynthia L. Martin, Chief Judge, Presiding, Janet Sutton, Judge and Gary Lynch, Special Judge

ORDER

Per curiam: Norman E. Davis appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. Davis asserts that the motion court committed clear error because his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to request lesser-included instructions, for failing to seek admission of excluded evidence on an alternative theory, for making an inaccurate pretrial concession, and for failing to require a stipulation correctly characterizing the nature of prior convictions. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
May 10, 2022
648 S.W.3d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Norman Edward DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

648 S.W.3d 764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)