From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 28, 2020
No. 81181 (Nev. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

No. 81181

05-28-2020

RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for own recognizance release based on the changed circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 crisis. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

The court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for own recognizance release based on the changed circumstances brought about by the COVID-19 crisis. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Stiglich /s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge

Raymond Tyrone Davis

Mueller & Associates

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Davis v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 28, 2020
No. 81181 (Nev. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND TYRONE DAVIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

No. 81181 (Nev. May. 28, 2020)