From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 1, 2021
329 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2578

12-01-2021

Robert L. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Robert L. Davis, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Robert L. Davis, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel"); Baldwin v. Crosby , 905 So. 2d 250, 251 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (explaining that in order to remove a lien placed on an inmate trust account, the "proper remedy is to file a motion in the circuit court seeking this relief, secure a ruling, and if necessary raise the issue when appellate review is sought of any final order in the proceedings below").

B.L. Thomas, Jay, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 1, 2021
329 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert L. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

329 So. 3d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)