From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Jan 21, 2020
591 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

ED 107579

01-21-2020

Tierrance DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Justin A. Moody, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Maleaner Harvey, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market Street, Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Justin A. Moody, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tierrance Davis appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.
Jan 21, 2020
591 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tierrance DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

Date published: Jan 21, 2020

Citations

591 S.W.3d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)