From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 10, 2019
590 S.W.3d 890 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107553

12-10-2019

Randell DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant. Evan J. Buchheim, 221 West High Street, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.


Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO. 63101, for appellant.

Evan J. Buchheim, 221 West High Street, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Mo. 65102, for respondent.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J.; Sherri B. Sullivan, J.; and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Randell Davis appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the motion court’s order. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 10, 2019
590 S.W.3d 890 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Randell DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Dec 10, 2019

Citations

590 S.W.3d 890 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)