And the verdict will be upheld so long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State's case. Davis v. State , 353 Ga. App. 651, 653 (1), 839 S.E.2d 184 (2020) (citation and punctuation omitted). So viewed, the evidence shows that the victim was engaged to Dunbar, but broke up with him in the summer of 2014 because she found out that he was still married.

See id. at 530 (2) (a), 820 S.E.2d 26 (holding that the trial court erred because "it relied primarily upon cases decided under Georgia's former Evidence Code, which are no longer applicable"). See also Davis v. State , 353 Ga. App. 651, 655 (2), 839 S.E.2d 184 (2020) ("This rule was designed to be used very rarely[ ] and only in exceptional circumstances. The rule applies only when certain exceptional guarantees of trustworthiness exist and when high degrees of probativeness and necessity are present ... [T]he unavailability of the declarant is not a prerequisite to admissibility under [OCGA § 24-8-807 ].") (punctuation omitted).