holding that a "minor omission" in the testimony regarding a particular step in the blood-drawing procedure was "insufficient to show that the State did not follow proper procedure or otherwise failed to establish a proper foundation."
Summary of this case from Hofmann v. StateNo. 540, 2017
01-23-2019
Willie DAVIS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.
AFFIRMED.
holding that a "minor omission" in the testimony regarding a particular step in the blood-drawing procedure was "insufficient to show that the State did not follow proper procedure or otherwise failed to establish a proper foundation."
Summary of this case from Hofmann v. StateFull title:Willie DAVIS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.
Date published: Jan 23, 2019
This is not a burdensome requirement given the purpose behind the twenty minute observation period and the…