From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 26, 2008
No. 03-07-00600-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. 03-07-00600-CR

Filed: September 26, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the District Court of Lampasas County, 27th Judicial District, No. 7975, Honorable C. W. Duncan Jr., Judge Presiding.

Before Justices PATTERSON, PURYEAR and HENSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Ryan Tony Davis appeals a judgment of conviction for burglary. In a previous opinion dated June 13, 2008, we overruled appellant's first issue, by which he contended that the trial court abused its discretion by overruling his motion for mistrial, but partially sustained appellant's second and remaining issue, by which he contended that the trial court's restitution order was not supported by the record. We abated the appeal for a restitution hearing and directed the trial court to prepare and file findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying to whom and in what amount restitution is to be made. See Barrera v. State, No. PD-1642-07 (Tex.Crim.App. Sept. 10, 2008) (reaffirming authorities relied on in our earlier opinion). A supplemental record has been filed containing the reporter's record of the restitution hearing and a clerk's record containing the trial court's findings and conclusions. The clerk's record also contains a copy of a reformed judgment of conviction specifying, consistent with the trial court's findings, that appellant is to pay $5,000 in restitution to the Lampasas Independent School District and $24,419.20 in restitution to the Texas Association of School Boards Insurance Company. We have examined the testimony at the restitution hearing and find that it supports the trial court's findings and conclusions. At the hearing, appellant's counsel stated that he had no objections to the findings. Having been given thirty days to do so, counsel has not filed a supplemental brief. We conclude that appellant's second issue was properly resolved by the trial court following abatement. There being no further issues raised by appellant, the reformed judgment of conviction is affirmed.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Sep 26, 2008
No. 03-07-00600-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan Tony Davis, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Sep 26, 2008

Citations

No. 03-07-00600-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 26, 2008)